Compare · honestly measured

Quolens vs Peec

Peec is a fellow EU player — the “lighter Profound”: clean, fast-shipping and agency-loved, with the best-regarded source view in the category. Quolens shares the EU/GDPR ground and adds the instrument layer: a Confidence Score on every number and the model-vs-live-grounding split. Here is the honest comparison.

5 rows where Peec leads — shown the same weight

Line by line — including where we lose.

We don’t hide the rows we don’t win. If Peec is the better tool for your job, this table should tell you — that’s the point.

clear strengthpartial / nuancedthe other side leadsunknown / unverified
Per-datapoint Confidence Score
How much each number moved across 3 runs.
Quolens
On every number

Same prompt asked 3× per engine; each datapoint carries its reliability.

Peec
Not surfaced per datapoint

A lighter tool without a per-number reliability score.

Model-vs-live-grounding split
Training memory vs live web fetch.
Quolens
Split on every mention

Separates the awareness problem from the content-freshness problem.

Peec
Not separated

Mentions tracked without the explicit model-vs-live split.

EU-built · GDPR-native
Data residency and the law it’s built under.
Quolens
EU-built, GDPR-native

EU residency and GDPR by design.

Peec
EU-built, GDPR-native

A fellow EU vendor — both score here; we won’t pretend otherwise.

MCP interface
Query readings from an AI client / agent.
Quolens
Built in from Starter

Live readings pulled straight into an MCP client.

Peec
API + MCP + Looker connector

Peec ships API, MCP and a Looker connector — both sides score here.

Honest free tier & entry price
Cost of a real reading, without a card.
Quolens
Free €0, then €49 Starter

One brand, real engines, no signup wall; entry starts at zero.

Peec
$95 / mo Starter

Published and fair — just not the cheaper entry, and no free tier.

Per-prompt source & citation view
Domains/URLs tabs with source-type categorisation.
Quolens
Source buckets per citation

Solid, but Peec’s source view is the best-regarded in the category.

Peec
Cleanest in category

UGC / editorial / corporate / competitor tagging on every source.

Agent / bot-crawl analytics
AI-bot server logs tied back to citations.
Quolens
Not offered

Quolens measures the answer side, not your server logs.

Peec
Crawl Insights

AI-bot log analysis connected to what actually gets cited.

Track record & real customer logos
We are pre-launch — no customers yet.
Quolens
Pre-launch — no customers yet

We have no customer logos to show and won’t invent them.

Peec
1,300+ customers, fast-shipping

A funded (~$29M) Berlin vendor with a strong agency base.

Peec details reflect public positioning verified 2026-07-09; verify before quoting. Quolens is pre-launch — no customer logos or testimonials are shown, by design.

Pricing, with dates.

Quolens · published
Free €0 · €49 · €199

Free €0, Starter €49/mo, Pro €199/mo, Scale €499/mo — published, no card to start, 14-day full-depth trial.

Peec · entry
$95 / mo · Starter

Peec publishes $95 / $245 / $495 brand tiers with unlimited seats, but only 3 base engines — extras are paid add-ons. Quolens publishes Free €0, Starter €49, Pro €199 — verify before quoting either.

Where Peec is the better fit

Choose Peec if you want the cleanest source-and-citation view in the category, crawl insights that tie AI-bot visits back to citations, and a fast-shipping EU vendor already trusted by 1,300+ customers and their agencies. If you also need to know how much to trust each number — the Confidence Score and the memory-vs-live split — that’s the line where Quolens earns its keep.

We’d rather you pick the right tool than the wrong one with our name on it. The honesty above is the whole product — an instrument that flatters itself isn’t one.

See exactly how we measure
See it on your own brand

See your own brand read against Peec.

A real reading across the engines that matter — your Share of Answer, a Confidence Score on every number, in about a minute. Free, no card.